Forex alternatives

IC Markets Alternatives
| Alternative | Why consider it | What to check | Commission ($)¹ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best overall | Check spread plus commission | $7 | View | |
| Best for lower Raw account commission | Check spread plus commission | $6 | View | |
| Cheapest headline commission | Check spread plus commission | $4.50 | View | |
| Strong for raw forex traders | Check spread plus commission | $6 | View | |
| Best for TradingView-focused traders | Check spread plus commission | $7 | View |
Pepperstone is the best overall alternative to IC Markets for most forex and CFD traders. It offers the closest like-for-like combination of raw-spread pricing, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradingView, while the Pepperstone Group operates through a broader range of regulated entities than IC Markets Global. FP Markets is the stronger choice if lower raw-account commission is the priority, while Fusion Markets has the lowest headline forex commission in this comparison.
The best IC Markets alternative depends on why you want to switch. A trader leaving IC Markets because of regulation has a different shortlist from someone looking for cheaper scalping costs, better TradingView support or a particular jurisdiction.
Pepperstone
- Best for
- Best overall alternative
- Headline raw FX commission*
- From $3.50 per lot, per side
- Main platforms
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, Pepperstone platform
- Key difference from IC Markets
- Closest overall substitute with broader group regulatory footprint
FP Markets
- Best for
- Lower-cost MetaTrader trading
- Headline raw FX commission*
- From $3 per lot, per side
- Main platforms
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
- Key difference from IC Markets
- Lower headline Raw commission than IC Markets
Fusion Markets
- Best for
- Lowest headline commission
- Headline raw FX commission*
- $2.25 per lot, per side
- Main platforms
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
- Key difference from IC Markets
- Significantly lower stated Zero account commission
Tickmill
- Best for
- Raw forex pricing, especially UK/EU users
- Headline raw FX commission*
- $3 per lot, per side on Raw
- Main platforms
- MT4, MT5, TradingView, Tickmill Trader
- Key difference from IC Markets
- Low Raw commission and FCA/CySEC-regulated entities
Eightcap
- Best for
- TradingView and multi-platform CFD trading
- Headline raw FX commission*
- $3.50 per lot, per side
- Main platforms
- MT4, MT5, TradingView, TradeLocker, depending on entity
- Key difference from IC Markets
- Strong TradingView-focused alternative
| Broker | Best for | Headline raw FX commission* | Main platforms | Key difference from IC Markets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best overall alternative | From $3.50 per lot, per side | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, Pepperstone platform | Closest overall substitute with broader group regulatory footprint | |
| Lower-cost MetaTrader trading | From $3 per lot, per side | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Lower headline Raw commission than IC Markets | |
| Lowest headline commission | $2.25 per lot, per side | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Significantly lower stated Zero account commission | |
| Raw forex pricing, especially UK/EU users | $3 per lot, per side on Raw | MT4, MT5, TradingView, Tickmill Trader | Low Raw commission and FCA/CySEC-regulated entities | |
| TradingView and multi-platform CFD trading | $3.50 per lot, per side | MT4, MT5, TradingView, TradeLocker, depending on entity | Strong TradingView-focused alternative |
*Headline commissions do not equal the total cost of trading. Spreads, overnight financing, currency conversion, slippage and the specific broker entity can materially change the effective cost.
IC Markets itself currently charges $3.50 per side, or $7 round turn, on a USD MetaTrader Raw Spread account. Its Raw Spread account advertises spreads from 0.0 pips, and IC Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradingView.
1. Pepperstone: best overall IC Markets alternative
Pepperstone's Razor account uses raw-spread plus commission pricing on forex and Spot Gold. Current Pepperstone pricing starts from 0.0 points on Razor forex trades, with commission from $3.50 per standard lot per side. Pepperstone also supports MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView, so an IC Markets trader can switch without completely changing their trading workflow.
That platform overlap is important. IC Markets is particularly popular with traders using MetaTrader Expert Advisors, scalping strategies, cTrader or external charting. Pepperstone covers virtually the same technology stack rather than forcing users onto a proprietary platform.
Pepperstone also has an advantage when comparing the regulatory footprint of the wider groups. Pepperstone states that its group is regulated through authorities including the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), BaFin, Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Capital Markets Authority of Kenya and Securities Commission of The Bahamas.
IC Markets Global, by comparison, is operated by Raw Trading Ltd and regulated by the Seychelles Financial Services Authority under licence SD018. IC Markets separately operates an EU entity authorised by CySEC.
That does not mean every Pepperstone customer receives FCA, ASIC or CySEC protection. Your protection depends on the legal entity that actually opens your account.
When Pepperstone is better than IC Markets
Choose Pepperstone if you want:
- a near like-for-like replacement for IC Markets
- MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView
- raw-spread pricing
- access to a broker group with several major regulatory licences
- a strong combination of forex, commodities, indices, shares and cryptocurrency CFDs
- the ability to move without rebuilding your entire trading setup
When IC Markets may still be better
IC Markets remains highly competitive for traders specifically focused on its execution environment, MetaTrader infrastructure and broad CFD offering.
IC Markets states that its Raw Spread MetaTrader servers are located in the Equinix NY4 data centre and that its Raw Spread account is designed for day traders, scalpers and Expert Advisor users. Its published average EUR/USD Raw Spread is 0.1 pip, although realised spreads vary with market conditions.
Verdict: If someone simply asks, “What broker is most similar to IC Markets?”, Pepperstone is the answer.
2. FP Markets: best alternative for lower Raw account commission
FP Markets currently lists its USD Raw account commission at $3 per standard lot per side, compared with $3.50 per side on IC Markets' USD MetaTrader Raw Spread account. Both advertise raw spreads starting at 0.0 pips.
That produces a simple headline commission comparison for one standard forex lot:
IC Markets Raw Spread, USD
- Commission per side
- $3.50
- Commission per round turn
- $7.00
FP Markets Raw, USD
- Commission per side
- $3.00
- Commission per round turn
- $6.00
| Broker/account | Commission per side | Commission per round turn |
|---|---|---|
| IC Markets Raw Spread, USD | $3.50 | $7.00 |
| FP Markets Raw, USD | $3.00 | $6.00 |
The $1 difference per standard-lot round trip is irrelevant to a low-volume trader. At high turnover, it becomes material.
For example, 500 standard-lot round trips would create a $500 difference in stated commission alone, before considering spreads, slippage or financing.
FP Markets also supports MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView on its Raw account and lists a $100 minimum deposit.
The FP Markets group includes entities regulated by authorities including ASIC, CySEC, South Africa's FSCA and the Seychelles FSA. Which entity is available depends on the trader's jurisdiction.
Who should choose FP Markets instead of IC Markets?
FP Markets makes the most sense for traders who:
- trade enough volume for a $1-per-lot round-turn commission difference to matter
- want MetaTrader, cTrader or TradingView
- want raw forex spreads rather than spread-only pricing
- want a broad multi-asset CFD catalogue
Do not switch brokers solely because one commission column is $1 cheaper. Run a matched comparison using the same currency pair, trading session, account type and position size. A small difference in realised spread or slippage can erase a nominal commission advantage.
Verdict: FP Markets is probably the strongest value alternative to IC Markets without moving to a substantially different type of broker.
3. Fusion Markets: cheapest headline commission alternative
The Fusion Markets Zero account charges $2.25 per standard lot per side, or $4.50 round turn, with spreads starting from 0.0 pips.
Against IC Markets' $7 USD round-turn Raw Spread commission, Fusion Markets' stated commission is $2.50 lower per completed standard-lot trade.
| Standard-lot forex round turn | Published commission |
|---|---|
| IC Markets Raw Spread | $7.00 |
| FP Markets Raw | $6.00 |
| Tickmill Raw | $6.00 |
| Fusion Markets Zero | $4.50 |
Round-turn commission on a standard lot
Raw-spread accounts only. The spread is charged on top of this.
Again, commission is only one component of trading cost. A serious comparison needs commission + realised spread + slippage + financing costs rather than simply sorting brokers by their “spreads from 0.0” marketing claims.
Fusion Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradingView, and it does not impose a general minimum deposit requirement.
The regulatory trade-off matters. Fusion Markets states that Australian clients can trade through its ASIC-regulated Australian entity, while other group entities include businesses regulated by the Seychelles FSA and Vanuatu Financial Services Commission.
Is Fusion Markets better than IC Markets?
Fusion Markets is better if minimising explicit trading commission is the dominant requirement and the entity available in your country is acceptable to you.
IC Markets is likely to remain more attractive if its particular execution infrastructure, product range or available regulatory entity is more important than saving $2.50 of commission per standard-lot round trip.
Verdict: Fusion Markets is the obvious IC Markets competitor to test when transaction cost is your primary reason for leaving.
4. Tickmill: strong IC Markets alternative for raw forex traders
Tickmill's current Raw account lists spreads from 0.0 pips and a $3 commission per standard lot per side. Its European Raw account has a starting deposit of 100 and supports MT4 and MT5.
Tickmill also offers direct TradingView connectivity through a separate TradingView Raw setup. Its current global TradingView pricing lists commission at $3.50 per lot per side.
The Tickmill group includes:
- Tickmill UK Ltd, authorised and regulated by the FCA
- Tickmill Europe Ltd, authorised and regulated by CySEC
- Tickmill Ltd, regulated by the Seychelles FSA
- Tickmill South Africa (Pty) Ltd, regulated by the FSCA
That makes Tickmill particularly worth investigating when the reason for searching for an IC Markets alternative is jurisdiction or regulatory structure rather than simply platform features.
Tickmill vs IC Markets
IC Markets has the broader all-in-one platform proposition because MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView sit inside the same broader ecosystem.
Tickmill becomes more compelling when low Raw forex commission and the particular regulated entity available to you matter more than cTrader access.
Verdict: Tickmill is a good IC Markets replacement for forex-first traders, particularly where its FCA or CySEC entity is available.
5. Eightcap: best alternative for TradingView-focused traders
Eightcap's Raw account currently advertises spreads from 0.0 pips and USD $3.50 commission per standard lot per side. That is the same headline USD commission as IC Markets' MetaTrader Raw Spread account.
Eightcap's global platform range includes MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView and TradeLocker, although platform availability changes between entities. For example, Eightcap's EU offering currently highlights MT5 and TradingView.
Eightcap also operates through multiple regulated entities. The UK business is FCA-regulated, the EU business is CySEC-regulated, and other international entities operate under regulators including the Securities Commission of The Bahamas, Seychelles FSA and Mauritius Financial Services Commission.
Verdict: Eightcap is not clearly cheaper than IC Markets, but it is a credible alternative when TradingView, platform UX or the available Eightcap legal entity better fits the trader.
Which IC Markets alternative has the lowest fees?
But ranking brokers purely by commission is the wrong calculation.
The actual cost of a forex trade is closer to:
effective trading cost = commission + realised bid/ask spread + slippage + financing + currency conversion or other applicable charges
A broker advertising a 0.0-pip minimum spread is not saying every trade is executed at zero spread.
For scalpers, Expert Advisors and high-frequency strategies, a few tenths of a pip in realised execution can matter more than a $0.50 difference in commission.
Which broker is most similar to IC Markets?
Both target active forex and CFD traders, offer raw-style pricing and support MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView. Pepperstone therefore requires less workflow change than alternatives that lack one of IC Markets' major platforms.
FP Markets is the next closest alternative, particularly for traders who care more about reducing headline Raw commission.
Which IC Markets alternative is best for scalping?
The reason is not simply that they advertise “0.0 pip spreads”. All three combine raw-style forex pricing with explicit commissions and platforms commonly used for active trading.
The sensible test is to open demo accounts, or appropriately sized live accounts where required for realistic execution testing, and measure the same strategy across brokers.
Compare:
- realised EUR/USD or other target-pair spread during the hours you actually trade
- commission per completed trade
- positive and negative slippage
- rejected or partially filled orders
- execution consistency around volatility
- swap costs if trades cross rollover
- VPS-to-server latency if the strategy is genuinely latency-sensitive
The winner on a broker comparison table is not necessarily the winner for your Expert Advisor.
Is Pepperstone better than IC Markets?
Pepperstone's biggest advantage is that it replicates most of the IC Markets proposition while adding a broad group licensing footprint and its own trading platform alongside MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView.
IC Markets remains difficult to beat as a specialist active-trading environment. Its published Raw account specifications include 0.0-pip minimum spreads, $7 USD round-turn MetaTrader commission and infrastructure explicitly aimed at scalpers and algorithmic traders.
What should you check before leaving IC Markets?
Do not choose an IC Markets alternative from a generic “best forex brokers” ranking.
Check the exact legal entity first.
A broker brand can operate regulated companies in the UK or EU and separate offshore entities elsewhere. Opening an account with the same brand does not mean every customer receives the same leverage limits, compensation scheme, negative balance protection or regulatory recourse.
Then compare the specific features that caused you to search for an alternative:
| If your priority is... | Start with... |
|---|---|
| Closest overall IC Markets replacement | Pepperstone |
| Lower Raw account commission | FP Markets |
| Lowest headline forex commission | Fusion Markets |
| FCA/CySEC entity plus low Raw forex fees | Tickmill |
| TradingView-focused trading | Eightcap |
| Existing IC Markets execution and platform setup already works | Consider staying with IC Markets |
There is no value in moving a profitable trading setup merely because another broker advertises a slightly lower minimum spread.
Do IC Markets alternatives accept US traders?
IC Markets Global explicitly lists the United States among its restricted jurisdictions. Fusion Markets also states that it does not accept US residents, while other brokers apply their own country-specific restrictions.
US traders should therefore compare firms specifically authorised for the products they want to trade in the United States rather than attempting to use an offshore IC Markets substitute.
Final verdict: what is the best alternative to IC Markets?
Pepperstone is the best IC Markets alternative overall in 2026. It is the closest match for active traders because it combines raw-spread pricing with MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView while operating through a broad range of regulated entities.
FP Markets is the better choice when reducing Raw account commission is the priority. Fusion Markets is the cheapest option here based on published forex commission alone. Tickmill is particularly competitive for forex traders who can access its FCA or CySEC entities, while Eightcap is worth considering for TradingView-focused CFD trading.
The final decision should be made at the account and legal-entity level, not the brand level. Compare the entity available in your country, then measure real trading costs on the instruments and sessions you actually use.
CFDs and leveraged forex products are high-risk instruments. Availability, leverage, investor protections and account conditions vary by jurisdiction, so verify the broker's current legal documents and fee schedule before funding an account.